What are the possible dangers of the proposed Ethereum Merge?

What are the possible dangers of the proposed Ethereum Merge?

The proposed Ethereum Merge has garnered a lot of attention in the past few weeks. But what are the possible dangers of this merger? In this article, we’ll explore the potential risks and how they could impact the cryptocurrency community. Continue reading for more information.

The biggest potential danger of the Ethereum Merge is that it could lead to an inflationary spiral, in which more and more Ether tokens are created and this creates a ripple effect that increases the value of all existing Ether tokens.

What is the Ethereum Merge?

The Merge combined Ethereum’s old execution layer with its new proof-of-stake consensus layer, which officially transitioned the network to using a proof-of-stake system.

Eth 2.0, now simply called Ethereum, has successfully merged its consensus layer with the original blockchain execution layer. The merge occurred on September 15th, 20202, signifying Ethereum’s transformation from proof-of-work (PoW) to proof-of stake (PoS).

The Merge has saved Ethereum considerable energy, reducing its consumption by 99.95%.

The Merge is the first step in Ethereum’s journey, with more to come including The Surge and The Verge. Technically speaking, it saw Ethereum’s original mainnet successfully combined with its new PoS consensus layer known as the Beacon Chain.

This new merge will allow Ethereum to be much more scalable, sustainable and secure while remaining decentralised, according to co-creator Vitalik Buterin. About 55% of the development work needed for this goal has been completed.

The Merge got rid of the demand for PoW, making it possible for the network to be safeguarded by Ethereum staking. Staking offers Ethereum holders an opportunity to receive benefits by furnishing the necessary processing power to approve transactions and defend the network. This also signifies that since the Merge, all exchanges on the system are now being examined by Ethereum stakers instead of miners.

The second notable change brought about by thePoS switch is the decrease in ETH rewards for validators who help maintain network security. As such, ETH becomes a deflationary asset.

Right now, Ethereum’s staking mechanism only allows deposits that cannot be withdrawn until later. Billions of ETH are currently being held on the network and unable to be used until a withdrawal feature is added by Ethereum’s developers.

What does the Ethereum Merge mean for miners?

The network now uses proof-of-stake to validate transactions, which makes Ethereum GPU mining much less profitable if not entirely unnecessary.

Since its start, the Ethereum network’s mainnet has run on proof-of-work, with miners constantly verifying blockchain transactions. However, instead of Proof-of-Work, Ethereum’s proof-of stake layer called the Beacon Chain uses builders to bundle transactions together and validators to then verify those transaction bundles. How much cryptocurrency a builder or validator owns decides their ability to select or validate blocks.

In an effort to make the network more sustainable, the Merge combined these two layers and fully adopted PoS,. This change makes Ethereum mining unproductive as validators are now more incentivised to preserve the network.

The network previously held around 95% of total GPU hashing power, allowing miners to validate transactions and earn rewards. Under PoS, a validator’s cryptocurrency is at stake, which acts as a disincentive for them to act maliciously.

Since the Merge, Ethereum’s hash rate has decline and is currently at zero. A lower hash rate means that a network requires less computing power to add and verify transactions on a blockchain. With Ethereum, the drop in hash rates is due to miners who have either turned off their rigs or switched to more profitable PoW-based cryptocurrencies.

What is Ethereum’s new consensus mechanism and how does it work?

While miners in a proof-of-work system use their money to validate a block, validators in a proof-of stake system risk losing their cryptocurrency.

Before a validator can start working on the network, they must first deposit 32 ETH into a smart contract. Once the funds have been deposited, they are locked in and the validator is free to begin staking. The Ether that is being staked serves as collateral, meaning that it could be destroyed if the validator acts maliciously.

Staking ETH doesn’t necessarily need to come from running a validator node. Other methods include participating in staking via centralised exchange, joining a pool, or delegating staking through a service provider.

Will the Merge change the Ethereum ecosystem?

The Merge does not change anything for ETH holders and other non-node operating users. There are a few necessary adjustments required of operators, developers and providers, though.

Because of the Merge, users that own or use ETH do not need to change anything related to their wallets or funds. Wallets work in the same way as they did before the Merge, and Ether held in them has not lost value or quantity. Even though we are transitioning to a new consensus mechanism, all of the history from the genesis block remains intact.

The way the network works and processes transactions is the only thing that changes for ETH holders. The Merge will have a bigger effect on miners, node operators, and developers than it does regular users. For example:

• After the Merge, staking node operators and providers will need to run both consensus and execution clients. They will also need to set a fee recipient address for transaction fees and maximal extractable value. Running only a consensus or an execution client won’t work because third-party endpoints that obtain data needed for executions will no longer exist post-Merge.
• Infrastructure providers and non-validating node operators will also need to run clients for both the execution layer and the consensus layer.
• If you’re a smart contract or decentralised application developer, it’s important to keep up with changes regarding block timing, block structure, opcode changes and sources of on-chain randomness.

What are the risks and flaws of the Ethereum merge?

A primary worry about the Merge is that it might lead to centralisation. Another possible anxiety is the likelihood of scams, as most people may not understand how the Merge works.

The problem with the Merge is that it will probably make the network more centralised. The people who validate blocks would get bigger rewards if they have a lot of power, and this could create a situation where only a few rich people or organizations control most of the system and can tell everyone what to do.

In the event of a fork, the five major organisations that control 64% of the network’s stake could choose which chain to support, possibly censoring transactions or double-spending funds. Critics are already discussing whether the Merge is a “rich get richer” scheme that will consolidate the power of current stakeholders.

Unless individuals can afford to stake their ETH, they may be unable to generate interest from their holdings. This could lead to centralisation, as only those with large sums of money would be able participate in staking.

Sadly, scammers often take advantage of major changes like The Merge by pretending users need to do something—usually involving giving up tokens—to finish the upgrading process. Another possibility for scams occurs when wallets are being upgraded; Software that’s pose as an official update may trick users into downloading it.

Lastly, miners who have been employed on Ethereum’s mainnet for years may yet decide to continue working there. After all, many of these miners have likely spent a lot of money on electricity and hardware expenses and may feel that they have more to gain by sticking with the tried-and-true mainnet.

While it’s unlikely, investors should still be aware that there is a possibility of a split in the Ethereum community which could lead to two versions of Ethereum running concurrently.

If you are looking for a reliable and user-friendly tax calculator to help calculate your cryptocurrency taxes in Australia, look no further than Crypto Tax Calculator Australia. With three different plans available to cater to your needs, we have got you covered. So why not give us a try today? You won’t be disappointed!